All social bonds and the self. The Phone Number List only thing that guarantees this nihilism of Western art and criticism, according to , is a greater alienation and immersion in capitalist . To this end, the author declares, referring above all to the current art scene: The conceptual intensity of modern, contemporary and conceptual art as such lies Phone Number List in the speculation surrounding the moment of its semantic gap. But as soon as such art dispatches that negative moment, nothing is left but theoretical genealogy, positive sociology, and Phone Number List cognitive routine, conditions that are not sensual, philosophical, or conceptual.

But that make art a mere piece of cognitive Phone Number List capital.4 contrasts this inhuman drift with the radical and iconoclastic revaluation of realism carried out by Soviet thinkers such as Mikhail and, furthermore, develops from that legacy an enormous critique of the modernist and avant-garde models that Phone Number List contemporary theory almost unanimously compares as examples supreme of European cultural primacy. Obviously, for such models are quite overrated. Another contribution of special interest in the book is its characterization of the drift of Phone Number List sexuality. The author documents and interprets how a process of began spontaneously in Soviet society and culture.

Of Eros, immanent to the very conditions of Phone Number List daily life and culture, to which the Marxist critique of Freudian psychoanalysis exercised by Valentin and others also corresponded, who denied the determining agency of the unconscious and the pleasure principle. argued that the unconscious consists of aspects of the generic Phone Number List social consciousness that have not been personalized by an individual consciousness. Likewise, he interpreted the pleasure principle as indistinguishable from the satisfaction of socially Phone Number List determined needs, which are not inherently opposed to cultural or social demands. According to , the liberal historiography of Soviet society is flatly wrong in ascribing.